International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research

SpO2/FiO2 versus PaO2/FiO2 Ratio for Assessing Oxygenation in Critically Ill Children Requiring Respiratory Support: A Prospective Observational Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Dr Sanjog K Goel1, Dr Yogesh Kumar Goel2, Dr Bharat Gupta3, Dr Ashish Chauhan4, Dr Swati Jain5

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Version of record

This is an author-deposited copy. The version of record was originally published elsewhere: Originally published in International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2026. DOI 10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.265-268 . Original source: https://www.allmedicaljournal.com/archives/year-2026.vol-7.issue-2.

Abstract

Background: The PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio derived from arterial blood gas analysis is the reference standard for grading oxygenation in critically ill children, but repeated arterial sampling is invasive and frequently impractical in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio obtained from pulse oximetry offers a non-invasive, continuous alternative. Aim: To compare the SF and PF ratios and evaluate the SF ratio as a surrogate marker of oxygenation, disease severity and outcome in critically ill children requiring respiratory support. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 125 children aged 2 months to 16 years requiring respiratory support (invasive ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula) in the PICU of a tertiary care hospital over 24 months. SpO2, PaO2 and FiO2 were recorded simultaneously at admission and again at clinical deterioration or 24 hours, whichever was earlier. SF and PF ratios were calculated and compared across ARDS severity, respiratory support modality and clinical outcome. Analysis was performed in SPSS v29.0; p < 0.05 was significant. Results: Mean age was 4.6 ± 4.4 years; bronchiolitis (23.2%) and pneumonia (12.0%) were the commonest diagnoses. SF and PF ratios fell in parallel with increasing ARDS severity at admission (non-ARDS SF 319.1/PF 393.1 vs severe SF 193.9/PF 209.5; p < 0.001 for both) and at 24 hours (p < 0.001). Both ratios were lowest in mechanically ventilated children and in non-survivors (admission SF 203.7/PF 202.0 in those who died vs SF 255.2/PF 276.5 in those discharged; p = 0.013 and 0.008). The prognostic separation widened at 24 hours (PF p < 0.001). Conclusion: The SF ratio paralleled the PF ratio across severity, support modality and outcome, supporting its use as a reliable non-invasive surrogate that may reduce arterial sampling and aid early risk stratification in the PICU.

Keywords: SpO2/FiO2 ratioPaO2/FiO2 ratiopediatric ARDSpulse oximetryoxygenation indexpediatric intensive care unit

Full text

Text extracted from the article PDF for reading and search. Tables, figures and equations are in the PDF, which remains the authoritative version.

1. Introduction

Accurate assessment of oxygenation is central to the management and prognosis of critically ill children requiring respiratory support. The PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio remains the reference standard for grading the severity of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, yet it depends on arterial blood gas sampling, which is invasive, intermittent and technically demanding in young children [1]. The SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio, derived from continuous pulse oximetry, has emerged as a practical non-invasive marker of lung oxygenation that can be measured at the bedside without repeated arterial puncture. Several studies report a moderate-to-strong correlation between the SF and PF ratios in critically ill children, supporting SF-based monitoring where arterial access is limited [2, 3] Reliance on the SF ratio may also facilitate earlier recognition of deterioration and guide escalation of ventilatory support while reducing the risks of arterial catheterization [4].

Given the clinical value of a validated non-invasive index, the present study compared the SF and PF ratios in critically ill children requiring respiratory support in a PICU and examined the behaviour of both indices across ARDS severity, mode of respiratory support and clinical outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

Study design and setting: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, over 24 months after institutional ethics committee approval and written informed parental consent.

Sample size: Using an expected ARDS prevalence of 21.8% (Lodha et al.), 95% confidence and 7.5% absolute precision, the required sample was 125 children⁵.

Participants: Children aged 2 months to 16 years requiring oxygen supplementation and respiratory support (invasive ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula), including those meeting PARDS criteria, were eligible. Children with congenital heart disease or anatomical lung anomalies, chronic lung disease, methemoglobinemia, or whose parents declined consent were excluded. Procedure: At admission, during the first arterial blood gas, SpO2 and PaO2 were recorded simultaneously together with the administered FiO2. A second set of values was obtained at clinical deterioration requiring escalation of support or at 24 hours, whichever occurred earlier. SF and PF ratios, oxygenation index (OI) and oxygen saturation index (OSI) were calculated, and ARDS severity classified using PARDS diagnostic criteria. The Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 (PIM-2) was computed at admission.

Statistical analysis: Data were analysed in SPSS v29.0. Continuous variables were summarised as mean ± SD and categorical variables as frequency (percentage). Groups were compared using the independent t-test or one-way ANOVA, and categorical associations using the chi-square test. ROC analysis was planned to identify SF-ratio thresholds corresponding to PF cut-offs of 200 and 300, and linear regression to model SF on PF. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

Table 1: Baseline characteristics and leading admission diagnoses (N = 125). Variable Category n (%) Sex Female / Male 72 (57.6) / 53 (42.4)

Pre-existing morbidity None 90 (72.0)

Over the first 24 hours, oxygenation and haemodynamics improved: mean FiO2 fell from 0.40 to 0.30, PaO2 rose from 100.5 to 105.1 mmHg, SF ratio from 251.1 to 302.8 and PF ratio from 270.3 to 338.9 (Table 2). The proportion of children on conventional oxygen support rose from 33.6% to 60.0%, with de-escalation of HFNC and CPAP, indicating early clinical stabilisation.

Table 3: SF and PF ratios by ARDS severity at admission (mean ± SD). ARDS status SF ratio PF ratio Absent 319.1 ± 63.3 393.1 ± 81.3 Present (non-invasive) 246.5 ± 29.7 256.7 ± 30.9 Mild 234.8 ± 39.7 251.6 ± 42.1 Moderate 231.6 ± 22.8 249.5 ± 46.1 Severe 193.9 ± 11.3 209.5 ± 39.1 p-value (ANOVA) <0.001 <0.001 Oxygenation indices were significantly associated with outcome (Table 4). Children who were discharged had the highest SF and PF ratios at admission and showed further improvement at 24 hours, whereas non-survivors had the lowest ratios at admission with minimal improvement. The prognostic separation strengthened over time, becoming most marked for the 24-hour PF ratio (p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

In this cohort of 125 critically ill children, the SF ratio mirrored the PF ratio across every stratification examined — ARDS severity, mode of respiratory support and clinical outcome — supporting its use as a non-invasive surrogate for oxygenation assessment. Unusually, the cohort showed a female predominance (57.6%), in contrast to the male preponderance generally reported in PICU respiratory admissions[6,7,8,9,] a difference that may reflect local referral and care-seeking patterns. The diagnostic spectrum, led by bronchiolitis and pneumonia, is consistent with international PICU data while also including a notable neurological and metabolic burden [10,11,12] The stepwise fall in both SF and PF ratios with worsening ARDS severity, significant at admission and at 24 hours (p < 0.001), aligns with reports validating saturation-based indices as reliable severity markers [13,14,15] The persistence of low ratios in mechanically ventilated children and the improvement seen in non-invasive groups echo evidence that 24-hour oxygenation metrics carry greater prognostic weight than admission values, and that failure to improve within the first day identifies a higher-risk subgroup [16,17] The close parallel between SF and PF observed here is concordant with prior pediatric work describing strong SF– PF correlation and SF thresholds (approximately 235 and 181) corresponding to PF cut-offs of 300 and 200 for ALI and ARDS [18,19] The outcome data, with markedly lower admission ratios among non-survivors, are consistent with reports that low SF and PF values strongly predict mortality and the need for intensive care²⁰. Together these findings reinforce the value of SF-based bedside monitoring, which avoids repeated arterial sampling while retaining the discriminative and prognostic properties of the PF ratio.

5. Limitations

This was a single-centre study with a modest sample, and the formal correlation coefficient and ROC-derived SF cut-off for this cohort were not finalised; quantifying these, together with multivariable adjustment for confounders, would strengthen the surrogate claim. SpO2 readings above 97% can saturate the pulse-oximetry signal and may attenuate SF performance at higher oxygenation levels.

6. Conclusion

The SpO2/FiO2 ratio closely paralleled the PaO2/FiO2 ratio across ARDS severity, respiratory support modality and clinical outcome in critically ill children. Because it is non-invasive, continuous and readily available, the SF ratio is a practical and reliable surrogate for the PF ratio that may reduce the need for repeated arterial blood gas sampling and assist early risk stratification and decision-making in the PICU.

7. Declarations

Ethics approval: Approved by the institutional ethics committee; written informed parental consent was obtained for every participant.

Funding: No external funding was received for this study. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions: All authors contributed to study design, data acquisition, analysis and manuscript preparation, and approved the final version.

References

  1. Lobete C, Medina A, Rey C, Mayordomo-Colunga J, Concha A, Menéndez S. Correlation of oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio with PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in a heterogeneous sample of critically ill children. J Crit Care. 2013;28(4):538.e1-538.e7.
  2. Singla S, Bhargava S, Pooni PA, et al. Comparison of SpO2- with PaO2-based indices of oxygenation in children with respiratory failure. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2024. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782523. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782523
  3. Hammer J. Acute respiratory failure in children. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013;14(2):64-9.
  4. Lodha R, Kabra SK, Pandey RM. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: experience at a tertiary care hospital. Indian Pediatr. 2001;38(10):1154-9.
  5. Almossawi O, Friend A, Palla L, et al. Is there a sex difference in mortality rates in paediatric intensive care units? A systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1225684.
  6. Ishaque S, Bibi N, Dawood ZS, et al. Burden of respiratory disease in pediatric intensive care unit: experience from a PICU of a tertiary care center in Pakistan. Crit Care Res Pract. 2024;2024:6704727.
  7. BinDahman HA. Mortality pattern and risk factors in pediatric ICU: a retrospective study at Mukalla Maternal and Childhood Hospital in Yemen (2021-2024). J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025;15(1):99.
  8. Heneghan JA, Reeder RW, Dean JM, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of critical illness in children with feeding and respiratory technology dependence. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(5):417-25.
  9. Aijaz A, Majeed A, Anwar-ul-Haque. Pattern and burden of respiratory diseases in pediatric intensive care unit. Prof Med J. 2025;32(6):658-63.
  10. Pelletier JH, Maholtz DE, Hanson CM, et al. Respiratory support practices for bronchiolitis in the pediatric intensive care unit. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(5):e2410746.
  11. Maneenil G, Premprat N, Janjindamai W, Dissaneevate S, Phatigomet M, Thatrimontrichai A. Correlation and prediction of oxygen index from oxygen saturation index in neonates with acute respiratory failure. Am J Perinatol. 2024;41(2). doi: 10.1055/a-1673-5251. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1673-5251
  12. Huang X, Xu L, Pei Y, et al. The association between oxygenation status at 24 h after diagnosis of pulmonary ARDS and 30-day mortality among pediatric oncological patients. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:805264.
  13. DesPrez K, McNeil JB, Wang C, Bastarache JA, Shaver CM, Ware LB. Oxygenation saturation index predicts clinical outcomes in ARDS. Chest. 2017;152(6):1151-8.
  14. Bilan N, Dastranji A, Behbahani AG. Comparison of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2015;7(1):28-31.
  15. Lohano PD, Baloch SH, Gowa MA, Raza SJ, Soomro L, Nawaz H. Correlation between SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in detection and risk stratification of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18353.
  16. Beniwal R, Batra P, Bhaskar V, Harit D. SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 for predicting intensive care admission in wheezy children: an observational study. Indian Pediatr. How to Cite This Article Goel SK, Goel YK, Gupta B, Chauhan A, Jain S. SpO2/FiO2 versus PaO2/FiO2 ratio for assessing oxygenation in critically ill children requiring respiratory support: a prospective observational study in a pediatric intensive care unit. Int J Med All Body Health Res. 2026;7(2):265-268. doi:10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.265-268. Copyright and License published articles. This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial-Share A like 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMBHR.2026.7.2.265-268

How to cite

Licensed under CC BY 4.0.